Some Peta supporters think that the organisation Has lost the plot by using a hardcore pornography actress to endorse their cause. While some people believe modern pornography to be harmless fantasy, many wives, mothers and womens rights groups see it as a medium that validates and ecourages women being degraded,and humilated in real life.
With Tiger Woods being dropped by sponsors for marriage misdamenours it certainly seems incredibly risque that Peta, a family orientated organistaion would risk losing their members support by using Sasha Grey, star of such titles like "Teenage Whores 3", "Slam It! In a Young Whore" and "Gang Bang My Face" to front their campaign.
Already a backlash is starting to gain momentum as many consider evaluating membership to Peta. Miss S, a rape crisis worker said "If they wanted shock value they've got it. However, I would certainly think twice about joining an organisation that uses prostitutes who simulate abuse of women, on camera, for money."
Right now, Peta have certainly gained the upper hand of publicity over charity rivals, but in the long run, will the organisations reputation be damaged for ever?
Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools
Posts
